The Ten Plagues
According to some theologians and commentators the miracles
of the Bible did not happen the way that the writers suggested. These people try
to replace the miracles with natural phenomena. While God did often use nature
itself to get the attention of His people or those amongst the heathen, it is
foolishness and unbelieving to disregard miracles in favour of human
interpretation. There are in fact greater problems raised than the miracles
themselves when we try to explain them away. For instance: If Jesus did walk on
submerged stones as He went across Lake Galilee, then the stones needed to be
huge enough to touch the bottom. Added to this is the fact that no boat would be
able to cross such a hazardous stretch of water. If the Red Sea were really the
Reed Sea being just a shallow land bridge, then how is it possible for all of
Pharaoh’s men to be drowned? The same can be said for the ten plagues that God
sent upon the Egyptians. Unbelieving scholars put forward explanations that
side-step the fact that God worked wonders before the Pharaoh. The God of the
sceptics has no divine power. Below are some of the reasons given to why we
should not see a miracle regarding God’s signs to the king of Egypt:
Plague 1: Water turned to blood
(Exodus 7:19-25)
The water turned blood-red because of a mixture of poisonous
algae and red soil that had been washed down from the African mountains through
the Blue Nile into the Nile itself These poisonous substances were responsible
for killing off the fish and leaving the Egyptians with no drinking water.
If this were the case, then the magicians had no need to
duplicate Moses’ trick (which of course it could not be since it was a natural
disaster) but simply point to the fact that this happens every year in that part
of Egypt. Also, if the algae and dirt was washed into the Nile thus polluting
the water, how did the water in the pools, rivers, streams, wooden and stone
containers become blood-red too?
Plague 2: Frogs (Exodus 8:1-5)
The frogs were forced out of the water because of the
pollution the river contained. The biggest problem with this argument is not why
the frogs were forced to leave the water, but the actually timing of the event.
Are we to believe that the fish died immediately due to the poisonous and
stinking water (7:21), but that the frogs lasted another seven days until Moses
came before Pharaoh again (7:25)? Again, why would the magicians
duplicate this? The king saw this as the hand of God and pleaded with Moses to
pray that the frogs be taken away.
Why would he do so if he knew that the frogs would die in a
few days anyway because of the natural occurrence of the polluted waters?
Plagues 3-6: Lice (8:16-19): Flies
(8:20-24): Murrain (9:1-7): Boils (9:8-12)
The sceptics do not treat these plagues as four separate
events but as united with or the result of one another.
The lice and flies are not two plagues but one in the eyes
of the liberal theologian. In this explanation the dead frogs and stagnant
waters become perfect breeding ground for mosquitoes, gnats, tse-fly and other
flying insects that infect livestock and men with infectious diseases. The
plague then becomes a simple natural event whereby the animals come down with
anthrax, and humans with open sores that will not heal.
If these plagues came as a result of the original pollution
caused by the algae and the red dirt, then how did those in Goshen (the Jews)
escape them. We then have to assume that there was some natural barrier that
kept the insects out!
Plague 7: Hail (9:22-35)
We are informed that it was normal for hail and
thunderstorms such as this to hit the Nile basin around February and March each
year, thus destroying crops of flax and barley. But the Bible tells us that
there was fire mixed in with the hail, this was no ordinary storm. The questions
have to be asked again, “How did the Jews in Goshen escape this?” and “Why
would Pharaoh ask Moses to pray if he had seen this every year of his life?”
Plague 8: Locust (10:12-20)
The terrible storm is said to have blown the locusts into
Egypt sometime in March. Though the Lord sent an east wind to blow the locusts
into Egypt we are left with the problem of the land of Goshen once again. The
“storm” interpretation removes the divine element from the explanation calls
for a miracle though. For the dust storm not only extinguished the natural light
of the sun, moon and stars, but it also put out the artificial light of the oil
lamps. Scripture tells us that the Egyptians did not move for three days because
even their oil lamps could not penetrate the darkness. This fact is borne out
with the statement, “They saw not one another, neither arose any from his
place for three days: but the children of Israel had light in their dwellings”
.This proves that the darkness was a miracle otherwise the dust storm that
stopped the Egyptians having even artificial light could not hinder the oil
lamps of the Jews.
Plague 10: Death (12:29-30)
This is the most difficult for the sceptics to explain away,
but they still suggest that the first born of humans and animals were infected
with a killer disease caused by the flies and lice. The younger population
escaped because they were healthier and stronger. For this to be true we have to
first assume that their were no young firstborn in the land of Egypt, that there
were no mothers with their first baby in their arms. Then, why did not the
disease affect the Jews who had the blood daubed on their doors? Anything other
than the direct action of God cannot explain what happened that night when the
angel of death appeared in Egypt.
Sceptics inform us that none of the plagues were strange or
uncommon to the Egyptians. In some sense this is probably true. They would have
seen the water pollution, diseases, dust storms, locusts as described above, but
never at the command of a man sent by God, and certainly not in such a powerful
way. God did manipulate nature in certain of the plagues, but the fact remain
that the Egyptians had never seen anything like them. They recognised God’s
hand behind every command that Moses made. In another sense, the plagues were
also God’s way of showing that the gods of Egypt (Hapi, Hathor, Re) were no
gods at all. And finally we must ask why the Israelites would follow a man that
they knew was simple a cunning magician. They had been in Egypt for over 400
years so must have had records of such things happening. If they did know the
real reasons for the plagues then they were a lot wiser than the Egyptians.
HOME BACK